Kevin Trenberth on “loudly proclaimed confindent statements”January 15, 2011
Kevin Trenberth is discussing the ramifications of Climategate with the American Meteorological Society. He had this to say about the anthropogenic global warming “deniers”…
“their false claims have not been scrutinized or criticized anything like enough…Debating them about the science is not an approach that is recommended. In a debate it is impossible to counter lies, and caveated statements show up poorly against loudly proclaimed confident statements that often have little or no basis”
Yes, I see his point. It must be really tough to get the truth across to the public with the onslaught of denier lies. That phalanx of well coordinated and lavishly financed deniers have grabbed all the attention, and the level-headed warnings coming from people like Trenberth are all but drowned out. His perseverance against such odds is truly awe-inspiring.
Who makes the loudest proclimations?
Try these Google searches…
“global warming” (past year) 103,000,000 hits
“climate change” (past year) : 295,000,000
climategate (past year): 1,870,000
Yup, the combination of “global warming” and “climate change” outpaced “climategate” by 200 to 1. Do the search on “climate change” and then tell me how many of the hits support the party line and how many support the “deniers.”
I’ll help you out with this exercise. Look the first page of hits – every hit supports the party line on AGW. Same with the second page. Same with the third.
We can get a pretty good idea of the lay of the land by skipping down to the 30th page of hits. (I have reproduced all the links below, any you can see screen image by enlarging the image at the left). I count one item that would fall into the “denier” camp (item #1 “Debating Climate Change with Anthropogenic Global Warming …”). One or two might pass as neutral, all the rest follow the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) party line.
Now look at the paid ads above the search hits and on the right sidebar. These links are also reproduced below. All eleven of these paid ads follow the AGW party line. Each add costs money and each one solicits for more money in one manner or another. They represent well-funded, organized efforts to push the AGW view.
So who is really making all the “loudly proclaimed confident statements?”
What has the “warmers” so upset?
They get the vast majority of the press and the accolades. They have more money and are highly organized. The “deniers” are mostly a ragtag group of lone individuals motivated by personal interest and receiving zero compensation. They are usually denigrated as kooks or quacks.
The problem is that those some of those “deniers” have more ability and insight than they are given credit for. Some of them make some pretty good points, uncover some pretty big inconsistencies and exaggerations, and ask some pretty tough questions.
Trenberth’s “future hurricane”
Speaking of “loudly proclaimed confident statements that often have little or no basis,” try this one on for size…
This is Trenberth’s less than caveated “future hurricane” from his 2007 Scientific American article. The inset shows hurricane Katrina at the same scale as his “future hurricane.” If Trenberth is at all curious about why his message seems to be losing traction, maybe he ought to look in the mirror for the perpetrator of a “loudly proclaimed confident statement that [has] little or no basis.”
30th page Google search results…
Oct 18, 2010 – In another conference I was once again asking questions about AGW and why Believers seem so adamant when there are so many unanswered questions….
2 days ago – Climate change has likely intensified the monsoon rains that have triggered record floods in Australia’s Queensland state, scientists said on Wednesday, …
6 hours ago – As our coastlines erode, we are also losing some of our great Massachusetts beach stories. But if we can adapt to climate change, we can save our beaches …
change.nature.org/ – Similar
Apr 13, 2010 – Michael Smith scanned the horizon, searching for the telltale sign that a whale and her youngster were near. With his powerful binoculars trained on the sea …
Jan 6, 2011 – In much the same role that marriage and abortion played in previous election cycles, denial of climate change has become a litmus test for the right. …
4 minutes ago – Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for … Climate change, theory of planned behavior and values: a structural equation model …
climatechangepsychology.blogspot.com/ – Similar
30th page Paid Ads
Adds from the sidebar
New Study: Effects of Warming on
Foreign Policy & National Securityhttp://www.cnas.org/climatechange
New Report Says Global Warming
Is “Undeniable.” Repower America!RepowerAmerica.org
CARE is working to help women
affected by climate change.http://www.CARE.org/ClimateChange
Get Simple Action Tips
Let Your Voice Be Heard!
Get the latest news and analysis
Visit American Farmland Trust!http://www.farmland.org/climatechange
Stop climate change now: how we can
use the deserts to produce energy.
Facts about Global Warming
Info, volunteer ideas and grantsDoSomething.org
Learn about Climate Change
With Interactive Games & Tips