Recall the six IPCC families of temperature scenarios, summed up in the following IPCC figure. VR2009 applied these temperature scenarios to their model to yield corresponding sea level rise rates. Let’s consider the A1F1 and A1T temperature scenarios.
Figure 1. (top) This is figure 10.26 from the IPCC AR4 Chapter 10, "Global Climate Projections." It shows the temperature projections for each of the six IPCC SRES emission scenarios averaged for the 19 AOGCM models and 3 carbon cycle feed backs and the standard deviations. (bottom) Zoom in on A1F1 and A1t averages.
Here are the resulting VR2009 sea-level rise rates for the A1T and A1F1 scenarios…
Figure 2. Resulting sea level rise rates when the VR2009 model is applied to the A1T and A1F1 temperature scenarios.
Nothing really surprising so far. The sea level rise rates look more or less like the temperatures.
Now consider some the following hypothetical 21st century scenarios. Note that they can’t be considered “extreme” when compared the 21st century temperature scenarios already used by VR2009.
Figure 3. The same IPCC temperature scenarios, A1T and A1F1, as in figure 1 and three hypothetical temperature scenarios from Moriarty.
Here are the resulting sea level rise rates…
Figure 4. The sea level rise rates due to the A1T and A1F1 temperature scenarios and three the hypothetical temperature scenarios from Moriarty.
Where are the sea level rise rates for Moriarty’s hypothetical temperature scenarios? They are perfectly hidden below the sea A1T sea level rise rate. How can that be? Because they were designed to be that way to make a point. See the math here and let γ=1 in equation (VIII) and you will get the idea. This is not some mistake in my math, but rather a direct consequence of the VR2009 and one more illustration of the bizarre consequences of their model.